Tisková zpráva
NGOs criticise Bulgarian state propaganda on Belene
9. září 2008 13:11
SOFIA (
Greenpeace International) -
Greenpeace and Bulgarian groups ask for EU investigation into tendering procedures
Bulgarian and international NGOs today asked
the EU Competition Commissioner Neelie Kroes to investigate the tendering
procedures for the construction of the Belene nuclear power plant in
northern Bulgaria. They also criticised the propaganda war that the
Bulgarian government is waging in order to hide the problems around the
project. Ten activists presented Bulgarian Prime Minister Sergey Stanishev
with a toy dragline, pointing out that playing around with nukes wastes time
for serious energy policy.
A group of 18 Bulgarian and two international NGOs (1) sent a letter to EU
Commissioner Kroes with the request to investigate the tendering process of
subcontractors in the Belene nuclear power station project. According to
media statements, subcontracts worth around 1 Billion Euro are to be
granted without tender to Bulgarian companies. The groups ask
Commissioner Kroes to investigate whether such tendering is not breaking
EU competition legislation and might give the nuclear power project an
illegitimate advantage. They also express concerns about possible
corruption and lack of transparency. "This is more proof that it is impossible
to build a nuclear power station within normal rules", commented Jan
Haverkamp, Greenpeace EU energy specialist.
The allegations come in the wake of increasing financial problems for the
project. "Banks are weary of investing in nuclear projects because of the
high risks involved. The cost of nuclear construction projects in Finland and
France are ballooning. The Bulgarian government has huge problems
finding financing for Belene. It should be made clear that opening the door to
corruption only makes things worse."
Bulgarian Prime Minister Sergey Stanishev and Economy and Energy
Minister Petar Dimitrov officially started construction at the Belene site only
one week ago. The groups strongly criticise the way the Bulgarian
government took the opportunity to spread propaganda about Belene.
"Government propaganda only serves to hide the reality of the project, which
has stalled because of lack of finance, confusion in the design, and seismic
activity in the area where the plant is being built," said Petko Kovachev,
director of the Green Policy Institute, a think tank based in Sofia. "It is
embarrassing to see how the government tries to manipulate facts."
According to the groups, last week the government spread false information
about the need for Belene, its benefit for battling climate change, the costs
of the project, the position of the European Union on the project, its safety
and about the participation of Bulgarian engineers in the project (2).
Greenpeace's Haverkamp said: "By staging a communist-style propaganda
campaign, Bulgarian officials do their country a huge disservice. By choosing
the nuclear path, the Bulgarian economy now faces large financial risks and
enormous uncertainties about whether at all, and if ever, electricity from
Belene will become available. In the meantime fast and flexible development
of the energy sector has completely stalled."
Kovachev added: "The government is attempting to dumb down its own
people. Last week's propaganda surge is an utter disgrace."
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Jan Haverkamp - Greenpeace EU policy campaigner energy
- tel.: +359 888 311 690, +32 477 790 416 (this week in Bulgaria)
e-mail: jan.haverkamp@greenpeace.org
Petko Kovachev - Green Policy Institute, BeleNE! coalition, CEE Bankwatch
tel.: +359 888 420 453
e-mail: petkok@bankwatch.org
NOTES FOR THE EDITOR
(1) The BeleNE coalition consists of the National movement
"Ekoglasnost","Ekoglasnost" Montana, Center for Environmental Education
and Information, Association "Earth Forever" - Svishtov, Committee for
ecological-economical defense of Svishtov, Foundation for agriculture and
environment - Pleven, Environmental association "For the Earth", ECO-
CLUB 2000, Environmental association "Demetra", GeoEcoClub
"Akademika" Veliko Tarnovo, Green Policy Institute, InfoECOclub-Vratsa,
Center for Environmental Law, Regional movement "EkoSouthWest", Union
of the experts on parks and landscape, Regional union of the farmers -
Valchedrum, Association "Civil alternative" - Elin Pelin, Environmental
association "Tetida" - Blagoevgrad.
The international organisations are Greenpeace and the CEE Bankwatch
Network
(2) The groups criticised the government of spreading false information on:
- The need for the Belene nuclear power plant
In spite of the closure of four nuclear blocks in Kozloduy, Bulgaria is still a
major exporter of electricity in the region. To Focus News Agency, Energy
Minister Dimitrov stated last week that Bulgaria earns as much from
electricity exports as it did before the closure of Kozloduy 3 and 4. Bulgaria
furthermore can improve its position in the short term by investing in energy
efficiency, decentralised heat-and-power co-generation and motivating
investments in renewable energy sources. Saying that "the Balkan region
suffers from systematic shortage of nuclear energy" (Prime Minister
Stanishev to Focus News Agency) is factually wrong. It suffers from a
systematic lack of proper energy policy.
- Belene and the climate
According to press agency BTA, Stanishev said last week, that "Without
development of nuclear power, it is impossible to halt adverse climate
change." In reality, projects like Belene are a barrier to investments into
flexible modern energy structures based on efficiency, decentralisation and
renewable energy sources and therefore block solutions to climate change.
Greenpeace clearly showed this in its energy [r]evolution scenario. Contrary
to that, the Bulgarian government has never done any scenario planning into
the impacts of its (lack of) energy policy. The energy [r]evolution scenario
can be found on http://www.energyblueprint.info
- Costs of Belene
Stanishev said last week that in 2007 Bulgaria had spent 70 million leva on
nuclear fuel and more than three billion leva on oil products. "That is why it is
important to stake on nuclear energy as economically more profitable for the
industry." Apart from the fact that nuclear power cannot replace oil, which is
mainly used for transport, chemical industry and heating and virtually not for
electricity production, the bulk of the nuclear bill consists of construction
costs for nuclear power plants. The government continues to use the figure
of 4 Billion Euro that represents the construction contract with
Atomstroyexport, although it warns that this might go up because of rising
resource costs. It refuses to mention the full construction cost, that
according to utility NEK will be around 7 Billion Euro.
- Belene and the EU
According to Stanishev, "The project enjoys the full support of the European
Union." The European Union is not allowed to support nuclear power, as this
is a national sovereign issue, nor has it ever openly supported Belene. Apart
from that, it is difficult to find out what the European Union thinks because
the Bulgarian government is blocking the full public release of the Opinion of
the European Commission under the Euratom Treaty art. 41 - 43. The only
piece Bulgaria accepted publication of shows that the opinion of the
Commission was based on highly contested information on seismic risk
used in the Environmental Impact Assessment.
- Safety of Belene
Energy Minister Dimitrov stated according Sofia News Agency that the
Belene plant would be a third generation nuclear power plant with a zero risk
for failures. This is simply not true. Human failure, targeted sabotage or
attack as well as not foreseen technical problems leave for every nuclear
power station design a rest risk.
- Participation of Bulgarian engineers in the project
Prime Minister Stanishev stated: "I am proud of Bulgarian power engineers,
who are capable of developing such a complicated design" (BTA). The
design was developed by Russian engineers. In reality, the project will
create only little Bulgarian jobs, as there is a lack of sufficiently educated
and skilled specialised construction personnel in the country. There are
plans to bring over hundreds of Russian, Chinese and Vietnamese workers
for Belene.
Jan Haverkamp
Greenpeace EU policy campaigner dirty energy
expert on energy issues in Central Europe
tel. Brussels: +32 2 27419 21
tel./fax CZ: +420 242 482 286
mobile B: +32 477 790 416
mobile CZ: +420 603 569 243
e-mail: jan.haverkamp@greenpeace.org
GREENPEACE EU Unit
http://www.greenpeace.org
http://eu.greenpeace.org
Jan Haverkamp
Online diskuse
Redakce Ekolistu.cz vítá čtenářské názory, komentáře a postřehy. Tím, že zde publikujete svůj příspěvek, se ale zároveň zavazujete dodržovat pravidla diskuse. V případě porušení pravidel si redakce vyhrazuje právo smazat diskusní příspěvek.
